<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Regarding Iran and Tomorrow&#8217;s Meeting, Engagement Must Be Seen as a Tactic, Not a Strategy</title>
	<link>http://www.heatherrobinson.net/blog/2009/09/30/regarding-iran-and-tomorrows-meeting-engagement-must-be-seen-as-a-tactic-not-a-strategy/</link>
	<description>Journalist - Middle East Commentator</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.heatherrobinson.net/blog/2009/09/30/regarding-iran-and-tomorrows-meeting-engagement-must-be-seen-as-a-tactic-not-a-strategy/#comment-23325</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 08:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heatherrobinson.net/blog/2009/09/30/regarding-iran-and-tomorrows-meeting-engagement-must-be-seen-as-a-tactic-not-a-strategy/#comment-23325</guid>
		<description>Rubin points out that neither Richard Nixon nor Ronald Reagan–two former presidents whose diplomacy is frequently cited as reflecting the positive, or at least non-injurious, effects of diplomacy with hostile enemies–ever stopped making military preparations as they participated in talks.

The comparison to China is an interesting one as the US and China had already fought against each other in Korea. Tensions were high and the Chinese had a anti American

However, although the countries had shut each other out, there was no immediate threat that China posing to the United States. Nixon was able to visit China and achieve a break through on some long standing simmering issues.

Unfortunately, Iran poses an acute and immediate threat to Europe, Israel and the middle east.

With the increasing threat Iran is posing everyday, the more analogous historical case may be the Cuban Missile Crisis where the Soviet Union placed nuclear missiles in Cuba capable of striking the United States.

Here, Kennedy certainly did negotiate with the Soviet Union extensively, but he did so while erecting a blockade of military equipment from the Soviet Union and prepared for a military strike or invasion.

In the end, the Soviet Union agreed to remove the missiles in Cuba while the US removed their missiles in Turkey.

Iran believes it will greatly benefit from having a nuclear weapons. It will only agree to cease its current course of action in negotiations if it believes, as Khrushchev eventually did in the Cuban Missile Crisis, that the current course of action would be too detrimental for them to continue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rubin points out that neither Richard Nixon nor Ronald Reagan–two former presidents whose diplomacy is frequently cited as reflecting the positive, or at least non-injurious, effects of diplomacy with hostile enemies–ever stopped making military preparations as they participated in talks.</p>
<p>The comparison to China is an interesting one as the US and China had already fought against each other in Korea. Tensions were high and the Chinese had a anti American</p>
<p>However, although the countries had shut each other out, there was no immediate threat that China posing to the United States. Nixon was able to visit China and achieve a break through on some long standing simmering issues.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, Iran poses an acute and immediate threat to Europe, Israel and the middle east.</p>
<p>With the increasing threat Iran is posing everyday, the more analogous historical case may be the Cuban Missile Crisis where the Soviet Union placed nuclear missiles in Cuba capable of striking the United States.</p>
<p>Here, Kennedy certainly did negotiate with the Soviet Union extensively, but he did so while erecting a blockade of military equipment from the Soviet Union and prepared for a military strike or invasion.</p>
<p>In the end, the Soviet Union agreed to remove the missiles in Cuba while the US removed their missiles in Turkey.</p>
<p>Iran believes it will greatly benefit from having a nuclear weapons. It will only agree to cease its current course of action in negotiations if it believes, as Khrushchev eventually did in the Cuban Missile Crisis, that the current course of action would be too detrimental for them to continue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.heatherrobinson.net/blog/2009/09/30/regarding-iran-and-tomorrows-meeting-engagement-must-be-seen-as-a-tactic-not-a-strategy/#comment-23324</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 08:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heatherrobinson.net/blog/2009/09/30/regarding-iran-and-tomorrows-meeting-engagement-must-be-seen-as-a-tactic-not-a-strategy/#comment-23324</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Rubin points out that neither Richard Nixon nor Ronald Reagan–two former presidents whose diplomacy is frequently cited as reflecting the positive, or at least non-injurious, effects of diplomacy with hostile enemies–ever stopped making military preparations as they participated in talks.&lt;/i&gt;

The comparison to China is an interesting one as the US and China had already fought against each other in Korea.  Tensions were high and the Chinese had a anti American 

However, although the countries had shut each other out, there was no immediate threat that China posing to the United States. Nixon was able to visit China and achieve a break through on some long standing simmering issues.

http://www.chizeng.com/nixon/conflict.html

Unfortunately, Iran poses an acute and immediate threat to Europe, Israel and the middle east.

With the increasing threat Iran is posing everyday, the more analogous historical case may be the Cuban Missile Crisis where the Soviet Union placed nuclear missiles in Cuba capable of striking the United States.

Here, Kennedy certainly did negotiate with the Soviet Union extensively, but he did so while erecting a blockade of military equipment from the Soviet Union and prepared for a military strike or invasion.

In the end, the Soviet Union agreed to remove the missiles in Cuba while the US removed their missiles in Turkey.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuban_Missile_Crisis

Iran believes it will greatly benefit from having a nuclear weapons.  It will only agree to cease its current course of action in negotiations if it believes, as Khrushchev eventually did in the Cuban Missile Crisis, that the current course of action would be too detrimental for them to continue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Rubin points out that neither Richard Nixon nor Ronald Reagan–two former presidents whose diplomacy is frequently cited as reflecting the positive, or at least non-injurious, effects of diplomacy with hostile enemies–ever stopped making military preparations as they participated in talks.</i></p>
<p>The comparison to China is an interesting one as the US and China had already fought against each other in Korea.  Tensions were high and the Chinese had a anti American </p>
<p>However, although the countries had shut each other out, there was no immediate threat that China posing to the United States. Nixon was able to visit China and achieve a break through on some long standing simmering issues.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chizeng.com/nixon/conflict.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.chizeng.com/nixon/conflict.html</a></p>
<p>Unfortunately, Iran poses an acute and immediate threat to Europe, Israel and the middle east.</p>
<p>With the increasing threat Iran is posing everyday, the more analogous historical case may be the Cuban Missile Crisis where the Soviet Union placed nuclear missiles in Cuba capable of striking the United States.</p>
<p>Here, Kennedy certainly did negotiate with the Soviet Union extensively, but he did so while erecting a blockade of military equipment from the Soviet Union and prepared for a military strike or invasion.</p>
<p>In the end, the Soviet Union agreed to remove the missiles in Cuba while the US removed their missiles in Turkey.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuban_Missile_Crisis" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuban_Missile_Crisis</a></p>
<p>Iran believes it will greatly benefit from having a nuclear weapons.  It will only agree to cease its current course of action in negotiations if it believes, as Khrushchev eventually did in the Cuban Missile Crisis, that the current course of action would be too detrimental for them to continue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

