Comments on: Angelina Gets It http://www.heatherrobinson.net/blog/2008/03/01/angelina-gets-it/ Journalist - Middle East Commentator Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:00:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3 By: Bill Ford http://www.heatherrobinson.net/blog/2008/03/01/angelina-gets-it/#comment-766 Bill Ford Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:26:45 +0000 http://www.heatherrobinson.net/blog/2008/03/01/angelina-gets-it/#comment-766 I read your Political Mavens articles and find them thought provoking. I have to respectfully disagree with your Angie Voight piece for the following reasons. 1. Iraq was created by the British after World War I. It is not a cohesive political unit. 2. The UN is a corrupt America and Christian and Jew hating organization used by Muslims as a platform for this murderous bile and by other petty tyrants who know not any shred of human decency. American needs to end all support and veto every measure then escort this garbage to the closest border minus the people who are there spying and after a full financial audit is performed. 3. Using US troops to defend Murderous Muslims from other murderous Muslims is a terrible waste and is exhausting the country’s spirit and welfare. You indicate Angie wants us there. Would she still have this support if we declared war against Islam and killed ten thousand Muslims every time they murdered a non-Muslim. That would stop the Jihad but I am sure she would oppose this measure. 4. Since when does the US have the right to occupy a country without a declaration of war? The Constitution grants no such authority. 5. Angie is in the Bible. Her name is Jezebel. I invite you to refresh your recollection of her life, times and demise. Thanks. I read your Political Mavens articles and find them thought provoking.

I have to respectfully disagree with your Angie Voight piece for the following reasons.

1. Iraq was created by the British after World War I. It is not a cohesive political unit.

2. The UN is a corrupt America and Christian and Jew hating organization used by Muslims as a platform for this murderous bile and by other petty tyrants who know not any shred of human decency. American needs to end all support and veto every measure then escort this garbage to the closest border minus the people who are there spying and after a full financial audit is performed.

3. Using US troops to defend Murderous Muslims from other murderous Muslims is a terrible waste and is exhausting the country’s spirit and welfare. You indicate Angie wants us there. Would she still have this support if we declared war against Islam and killed ten thousand Muslims every time they murdered a non-Muslim. That would stop the Jihad but I am sure she would oppose this measure.

4. Since when does the US have the right to occupy a country without a declaration of war? The Constitution grants no such authority.

5. Angie is in the Bible. Her name is Jezebel. I invite you to refresh your recollection of her life, times and demise.

Thanks.

]]> By: Heather Robinson » At Least Angelina Bothered to Talk With the Troops http://www.heatherrobinson.net/blog/2008/03/01/angelina-gets-it/#comment-752 Heather Robinson » At Least Angelina Bothered to Talk With the Troops Mon, 03 Mar 2008 06:38:04 +0000 http://www.heatherrobinson.net/blog/2008/03/01/angelina-gets-it/#comment-752 [...] received a couple of comments to my last post about Angelina Jolie to the effect that celebrities are generally full of it and I should be [...] […] received a couple of comments to my last post about Angelina Jolie to the effect that celebrities are generally full of it and I should be […]

]]> By: Marylin Pitz http://www.heatherrobinson.net/blog/2008/03/01/angelina-gets-it/#comment-746 Marylin Pitz Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:34:51 +0000 http://www.heatherrobinson.net/blog/2008/03/01/angelina-gets-it/#comment-746 I admire your open-mindedness, Ms. R. in seeing some good in the activities of the UN, which is so notably biased and unfair as well as downright corrupt in its usuual activities, when they, as in this rare instance, do something decent. I am, however, generally suspect of the political opinions of "celebrites," since they are not ususally "celebrated," in this media-mad pop culture, for anything other than their fine camera angles or sex appeal. Anyway, thanks for your insight. Best, M.P. I admire your open-mindedness, Ms. R. in seeing some good in the activities of the UN, which is so notably biased and unfair as well as downright corrupt in its usuual activities, when they, as in this rare instance, do something decent. I am, however, generally suspect of the political opinions of “celebrites,” since they are not ususally “celebrated,” in this media-mad pop culture, for anything other than their fine camera angles or sex appeal.
Anyway, thanks for your insight. Best, M.P.

]]>